![]() Let's take a look at what Topaz Photo AI has to offer! A clean and simple interface with a couple of quirksĪs you'd expect given its fuss-free approach to editing and its complete eschewing of features like photo management, Topaz Photo AI has an exceptionally simple and clean user interface. It can function either as a standalone app or as a plugin for other applications like Adobe Photoshop. ![]() If launched standalone, you can load images either by dragging and dropping images onto the app, or browsing your drives, from which you can load them individually or in groups. Once an image is loaded, Photo AI will scan it for subjects, human faces and image quality shortcomings, then automatically generate the corrections it thinks your photo needs. In the standalone app you'll see a filmstrip of all your open images beneath a preview of the current image. ![]() It also fixes problems that many photographers will be working quite hard to avoid in the first place.Curiously, though, the filmstrip will only show thumbnails for JPEG images. When it doesn’t, it’s a bit disappointing, especially in view of the cost and the time it takes. When it works, Topaz Photo AI is very good. ![]() Topaz Photo AI is expensive and quite slow to use, and while it can fix some photo problems remarkably well, they have to fall into what I’ll call its ‘fixability window’, and you have to have enough of these problem photos in the first place to make it worth the cost. With phone images I found it tended to upscale the phone processing artefacts rather than finding or adding new detail. The upscaling works really well on images with good intrinsic detail and not too much processing – such as those from a DSLR or mirrorless camera. The Upscale and Enhance Resolution tools will often be used together. There is a ‘processed’ look about the results, but it’s still an effective tool for rescuing or enhancing unrepeatable people shots. It works surprisingly well on people who are just out of focus or not quite sharp. The Recover Faces tool kicks in when the software recognizes faces in the frame and thinks they need fixing. Shots that were just slightly soft underwent a pretty dramatic transformation, and shots with poor focusing had variable outcomes – often with obviously processed edge detail and ‘filling in’ of the sort you see with over-processed phone images. I found that shots on the wrong side of its ‘fixability’ threshold were made worse – including any kind of double-image blur from camera shake. The Sharpen process can be spectacular or bad, depending on the image. I wouldn’t put this in the same league as DxO’s DeepPRIME XD processing. I found myself pushing the Detail slider up to maximum and the Strength slider down to zero to get results that looked smooth and crisp. The noise removal is very effective but quite aggressive by default. The results vary, depending on the quality of the image you’re starting from and its particular issues. The recovered detail in the rocks and the leaves, top right, is pretty remarkable. This is the most spectacular outcome, though the Autopilot didn't think this needed sharpening it all, so it was done manually.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |